Follow my blog with Bloglovin Business Strategist: 2025 ""

Tuesday, 10 June 2025

China Rare Earth ban tactical to strategic

Often in military conflict a tactical move would easily transform to a strategic one when the impact is tectonic. Business strategy is no stranger to this eventuality. President Trump failed to grasp this strategy manoeuvre when he imposed huge tariff on China. China responded with rare earth ban.

Most of the rare earth usually referred as RE are critical minerals. Out of these there are seven key critical ones, samarium, gadolinium, terbium, dysprosium, lutetium, scandium, and yttrium. Most countries that are pitched on technology production such as United States are particularly vulnerable due to the supply chain disruptions that can be caused by the exporter.

According to International Energy Agency (IEA) China accounts for about 40% of global reserves, 68% of production and 88% of global supply of Rare Earth minerals. By 2030 two major countries that are in the game would fare according to the stats below:

Mining: China 54% and Australia 18% globally

Refining: China 77% and Australia 12% globally

More than mining it is refining that matters a lot. Once that stage is passed readying RE for export is the most critical function. As regard to RE China has all spectrum neatly fit into her exporting RE in the required form? Put it the other way, China dominates the entire supply chain from the mines to the ports.

If China chooses, there can be a supply chain disruptions at any time. All importing nations of RE have to be at the beck and call of the dragon. It is evidenced that response by importing nations is low bereft of a scintilla of negotiating clout.

The counter measure of RE Restrictions imposed by China to the Trump Tariff is hugely consequential as seen here-under:

a) It cripples US technology suave in terms arms manufacturing and chips production that has dual role in commerce & military

b) At present US stockpile of RE is at dangerously low level and expected to hit bottom before the on this year 2025

c) Entire gamut of productions for civilian use such as technology equipment, electric vehicles and other consumer electronics items have to halted till the supply of RE is replenished to the earlier levels.

In a classic tactical move ending as a startling manoeuvre in business strategy China was able to call the bluff of America and at the same time landed a critical blow to each and every country that dares to touch Chinese exports in the future?

Was it Sun Tzu or Carl Von Clausewitz?  

As a business strategist navigating amid geoeconomics, I submit that it is indeed Clausewitz whose expertise in creating fog of war, friction and chaos amongst allies & enemies has taught the Chinese how to respond to Trump Mania!

 

Cheers!

 

Muthu Ashraff Rajulu

Business Strategist

Mobile: + 94 777 265677

E-mail: cosmicgems@gmail.com

Blog:   Business Strategist

 


 

Thursday, 5 June 2025

Indo Pak air war gives geoeconomics boost to Pakistan

Whether who won and who lost in the recent air war between India & Pakistan is a geo strategy subject. What matters to me is how Pak boosted her clout in the area of geoeconomics by carefully navigating from war to the business world. Here are snippets from my take:

1. USA policy changes are explicit as regards to their near-negative approach towards Pakistan when U.S. President Donald Trump announced on May 13, 2025, that representatives from Pakistan are coming to the United States to talk over trade & tariff. Pakistan faces a potential 29% tariff on its exports to the United States due to a USD 3 billion trade surplus with USA. This may be mollified to the lower figure. Moreover, it is also announced that South Asia’s crypto hub would be located in Pakistan.

2. Russia signs an agreement valued at USD 2.8 Billion to re-build the Soviet Era steel mill located close to Karachi Port that was discarded in the 1990s due to tensed political situation prevailing at that time.

3. Afghanistan formally joins China Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC) as an extended party and vouches for banning all anti-Pakistan terrorist activities that emanate from its soil. She further made a special mention of Tehreek-i-Taliban Pakistan (TTP) which remains as a thorn in the flesh of Pakistan for quite sometimes.

4. Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) is being sourced from Azerbaijan at USD 4.6 Billion, Qatar at USD 3 Billion and UAE at USD 1 Billion.

5. In addition World Bank which has a significant lending and investment portfolio in Pakistan, with a total commitment of USD 17 billion across 106 projects would extend it to USD 40 Billion. China, in the meantime defers repayment of existing loans estimated to be USD 3.7 Billion.

6. Overall trade is being boosted. Iran is eying an amount close to USD 10 Billion, Turkey on the other hand harking for above USD 5 Billion. Turkey in turn seeks joint ventures for producing drones, electric vehicles and field armaments.

7. Buying Pakistan military hardware opens up with a bang as Azerbaijan booked USD 4.6 Billion worth of JF-17 jets manufactured by Pakistan under licence from Chengdu Aircraft Industry Group (CAIG) of China.

In sum, the last air war gave a big publicity boast like of which was not seen after the end of World War II when the globe was awakened to the plethora of investments flowing into Japan & Europe. The crux of the matter is Indo-Pak air has morphed into as a moment of denouement where Pakistan emerging victorious not only in terms of military might but squarely in the field of geoeconomics!

 

Cheers!

 

Muthu Ashraff Rajulu

Business Strategist

Mobile: + 94 777 265677

E-mail: cosmicgems@gmail.com

Blog:   Business Strategist

Monday, 2 June 2025

Should Dassault Aviation revisit “Made in India” business strategy?

Eric Trappier, CEO of Dassault Aviation has full of ‘must do tasks’ on his table. The uppermost in his mind and that of the Dassault board of directors is how to proceed with the “Made in India” business strategy. This is the first time in decades Rafale fighters were downed in an air battle.

The recent air to air fight between India & Pakistan brought the surprising news of the downing of Rafale jetfighters numbering 3 by little known Chinese J 10 jet fighters manufactured by Chengdu Aircraft Industry Group of China. These fighters are used only in China and Pakistan, unlike in the case of Rafale which is the mainstay of France and host of other nations including Egypt, India, Indonesia, Qatar and UAE. The credence of earlier Mirage Plane is superimposed on Rafale.

Dassault Aviation, is capable of designing, manufacturing supporting and upgrading of Rafale series where the present version of Rafale 4 is being marketed throughout the globe. In 2024 Dassault turned out 21 such planes out of which 7 were exported. An improved version, Rafale 5 is on the design table and would fly in the sky by 2030. By every standard the order book for Rafale is fabulous. The year 2024 recorded 30 units and the company estimates additional 40 would be booked for 202

Eric went on the marketing blitz and negotiated with India over the biz strategy codenamed “Made in India” with a two pronged hook. Whereas Dassault is responsible for the techno & source code, Indian collaborator would be responsible for assembly & maintenance. By this scheme, Dassault focuses on three purposes goals:

a) Markets that are large in terms of asset allocation to air force in their overall defence expenditure

b) Countries that cannot afford or approach for jet fighters such as F 35 and Eurofighter Typhoon

c) India is a convenient point not only for supply and service for the Indian air force but for supplying panes to nearby markets such as Indonesia.

Well India alone is a big customer. Around 36 planes were on order with a price tag of USD 288 per piece. Besides India, UAE booked 80, Egypt 55, Indonesia 42 and Qatar 36.

Fate struck on May 7, 2025. Almost 3 Raffle planes were shot down by Pak pilots. Rumours are in the air that this number is actually 4. French military concedes one such plane being brought down. Aurangzeb Ahmed of Pakistan air force showed sky map with 3 Rafale planes being put out of action.

Eric Trappier is in the phase of damage control. In Jakarta recently he assured Indonesian authorities that nothing much is wrong with the plane. In fact he expects Indonesian order book which is currently at 36 would go up with additional 42 units in 2026. But the critical questions still remain as regards to Dassault biz strategy:

1. Is Rafale 4 is a stable jetfighter in the overall aerodynamics of a war zone?

2. Is it the plane or the pilot matters in the downing? Aurangzeb Ahmed did not pass the blame on Rafale 4.

3. Which is superior in actual battle conditions Rafale 4 or J-10 of Chengdu?

4. Which would work better PL 15 air-to-air missile of Chengdu or Meteor of Rafale 4?

5. Finally, whether “Made in India” biz strategy should be abandoned or re-visited?

6. How Eric can navigate the bitterness that felt by the Indian side re the loss of Rafale which might morph into a commercial dispute between the two parties?

7. How can Dassault solve this setback imaginatively?

 

Cheers!

 

Muthu Ashraff Rajulu

Business Strategist

Mobile: + 94 777 265677

E-mail: cosmicgems@gmail.com

Blog:   Business Strategist